Evolution versus Creativity
...the two sides of Creation!
Evolution? *
1) Option_i stands for the formal evolution
towards what is mass-attractive towards forming
the fashion of the zeitgeist. It is permanently
self-destructive, and that is the innate dynamic
of evolution which in itself divides every
creative entity so is can be ruled. Applied to life
and real people up to humanity, this evokes
the known human catastrophes
click
2) Similarly real human beings have an outer option_i,
objective awareness which they form under option_i with
their personally-neutral, tribal language, and an inner
one which makes individuals awaken to themselves as a
created being to then make use of Option_i with their
personally relevant open-ended generative principles.
And that requires a corresponding emancipation from the
collective culture of “the others” which make us other-
determined, merely evolutionary, self-destructively
unfulfilled, drawn to crap magnets, trend speakers...
![[x]](index_htm_files/close.png "Schließen")
3) And so you are borne with the challenge of
giving meaning to your dead end option_i
positioning in the zeitgeist and Option_ii, to
your life- through task fulfillment. Thereby the
option_i is still default in humanity, thus a crap
magnet to cannibalizes life on Earth..
The above three steps towards a desirable
balance of option_i versus Option_ii,
M=manipulation versus O=orientation
require accepting that
a) M / O = STRESS < DEATH, and
b) personal responsibility for one’s options;
they can be outlined - necessarily beyond
the default option_i - with one’s personal i-
GPS - above as an example, the one
relevant for me with my innate 9Pp principle
of lifefulfillment.
5) [9Pp: h1y1c6M6] is my requirement to be able to take
sufficient responsibility, for my up to my B3-path to fulfill my X-
9Pp being. To have my lifefulfilling impact with a F9-basics for
a P=Process which p=prepares my task fulfillment, I obviously
need a h-living space with the basics to be able to handle the
y-minimal necessity of §1-expressing (up year 5) my §2-
purpose in view of the outlined, basically 1=very bad sucking
power of option_i (to be mastered up to age 10). Then I had
the take-off inner energy released to c=profile my §3-
personal integrity (necessary for teenagers up to 15): This
leaves sheeple,
people like sheep,
under option_i, in the
dust to complain. This
requires rules, thus
giving more meaning
to option_i; a devil’s
circle which, without
sufficient relevant i-GPS considered, is stressing those
concerned to death! This makes the survivors give in to
option_i and globalize it as one concentration camp -
achieved - now YOUR CHALLENGE TOO:
6) The first three 5-year cycles of §1-2-3 of inner development
should result in the §1-2 take off energy to be mastered with
§3-personal integrity. Then as a teenager from year 15-20,
people can learn to take personally relevant responsibility
towards what is to them a desirably §0-sustainable adulthood.
That meant for me getting in touch with what is 6=very good in
personally-neutral terms. And that can only be the laws of
nature, and so my option_i career was in physics, up to the M-
maximally in the Swiss-Army alarm service of ABC (atomic-
biological-chemical) warfare - see what I mean and why I, at
the age of 35, in 1979, I took responsibility for my B3-path to
found Applied Personal Science?
